·Niko Laamanen · blog  · 2 min read

Response to revolutionary publishers

My response to ‘revolutionary publishers’ shilling AI

My response to ‘revolutionary publishers’ shilling AI

My response to ‘revolutionary publishers’ shilling AI

You’re not disrupting anything.

Human action dictates whether a book succeeds or fails.

Last week, a picture of the four smug founder dudes from ‘revolutionary publisher’ Spines went viral. @Spines_com is a platform that automates editing, covers, translation, audiobooks, and more. The company raised $16m in VC and plans to publish 8,000 books next year.

Most people were pissed off when they saw the news:

  • Publishers claiming it’s a predatory vanity press
  • Authors bemoaning the fees, saying KDP is cheaper
  • Readers questioning the need for a tranche of low-quality titles
  • Editors and translators in fear of losing work

As a publisher with a similar model, I’m not pissed; I’m ambivalent.

Spines charges authors up to $5k to ‘harness the power of AI’.

True, they do provide a cheap and fast option for authors, while traditional publishers can take years to release a book.

All 8,000 books fail without anyone to read them.

When The Bookseller asked Spines to provide sales data for their ‘bestsellers,’ Spines refused 😅. The lesson? Do the work or become the product.

Microsoft is also working with big publishers to train their AI models on their books, and many big tech firms and publishing houses are getting involved.

Here’s what I think is really going on…

It’s about the data. They want to train their LLMs on your manuscripts.

Spines and Microsoft don’t give a fuck if you sell any copies.

They want to build machines capable of cutting humans out of the creative process. They might even succeed. My prediction? Spines will be bought by Penguin Random House within 24 months.

But our community won’t give up the right to thought.

Konsensus Network has been connecting authors and readers since 2019.

We want to tranform your ideas into books that change the world.

And we want you to succeed because we believe in the same ideals.


If you have a freedom manuscript in the works, we want to hear about it. Book a free call with me, and we’ll strategize and go through your options.

If you don’t invest the time, effort, and money in your book project, you don’t truly believe in its ideas.

Authors who settle for a low-rent print-a-page service with zero strategy or support are spineless. And they know where to go.

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »

All good monies are alike; each bad money is bad in its own way

As soon as the spot Bitcoin ETF was approved by the SEC in January this year, I wrote here about this important step for the institutional adoption of Bitcoin in the United States, also addressing the short- and long-term risks involved with this type of financial product. Now that, unexpectedly and through political pressure, the SEC has also approved the spot Ethereum (ETH) ETF, I will go into detail about how I believe the competition between these different ETFs will play out in the market.

AI, Bitcoin and Gresham's Law

Absent government coercive controls, people and markets in general will always prefer to use hard rather than soft money. In situations of freedom, the strong money 'drives out' the soft money.